|
Post by w3erdf on Oct 19, 2012 18:40:47 GMT 10
No obstante, el equipo que dirige el técnico Joaquín Caparrós ha sufrido un duro golpe www.comprafutbol2012.com/ con las lesiones de tres jugadores muy importantes, titulares todos ellos, en los últimos veinte días, como los defensas José Carlos de Araújo Nunes y Antonio López, y el centrocampista Javi Márquez. Las bajas, a las que se suma el lateral camiseta de real madrid 2012 derecho Ximo, expulsado la pasada jornada en Getafe, se prolongarán entre dos y tres meses y obligarán a Caparrós a www.comprafutbol2012.com/ modificar un 'once' que estaba rindiendo a un nivel máximo.
|
|
|
Post by chookmustard on Oct 23, 2012 18:59:22 GMT 10
I'm guessing you are a troll phisher or sommat?
|
|
|
Post by angra on Oct 24, 2012 11:32:00 GMT 10
Jules - can we do anything about the Spanish bozo who keeps posting football results?
|
|
|
Post by adlrope on Nov 9, 2012 20:33:23 GMT 10
Greetings
I finally got around to listening to my Something Wonky podcasts during a 1200 Km drive home from central Queensland. And thus I have found out where the former Pure Poisonistas hang out.
I posted irregularly on PP, as Adam Rope, and will try to keep up with this site.
Cheers all.
PS Has anyone heard from Captain Col? I was never sure who was more humourous, in their statements about climate change, the good Captain or Tamas Calderwood.
|
|
|
Post by Matthew Of Canberra on Nov 10, 2012 10:20:10 GMT 10
"I finally got around to listening to my Something Wonky podcasts during a 1200 Km drive home from central Queensland"
Welcome!
Podcasts are brilliant for road trips. I ended up as a proper subscriber to the "british history podcast" after I found myself spontaneously listening to it more or less constantly between canberra and adelaide last year.
"And thus I have found out where the former Pure Poisonistas hang out"
GOPP got a mention? Hmm. I don't remember that. I'll have to go back and listen to them all again!
I don't think we've had any posts from CC. It's a pity. A bit of argy bargy would be fun :-)
|
|
|
Post by Matthew Of Canberra on Nov 10, 2012 10:51:24 GMT 10
Gen Petraus has resigned. Abruptly.
A week before he was due to testify at hearings about the Benghazi incident.
Teh Rights is going mental.
|
|
|
Post by jack on Nov 10, 2012 21:54:24 GMT 10
The apparently-genuine Rupert has tweeted on the Petraeus thing... Petraeus resignation. Timing, everything suspicious. There has to be more to this story.
And... Petraeus will deny any mystery. Still certain was induced to prevent embarrassing evidence at next weeks's hearings [Congressional hearings into the Benghazi incident]. not idle speculation [hmmm, ominous!]
Canny observers have tweet/speculated that Rupe thinks it's all about the Benghazi thing. If so, he needs to speak to his opinion editor for the Daily Tele, because Timmeh evidently believes... ...it definitely has nothing to do with Benghazi.
blogs.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/timblair/index.php/dailytelegraph/comments/four_star_education/ Maybe just a smidge of irony there, as he goes on to observe... It is still unclear to me why Petraeus’s resignation excuses him from testimony. [Me too, actually.] Then quotes Charles Krauthammer about the "Benghazi story". In short, News £td and those who sail in her are hoping against hope itself that the Petraeus thing will cause not inconsiderable problems for Obama, shitting all over his victory parade, and providing at least some consolation for the Romney rout. They're just being uncharacteristically conservative about it, that's all.
|
|
|
Post by Matthew Of Canberra on Nov 10, 2012 22:22:50 GMT 10
Murdoch's lost it. Surely the reason petraeus left it until now is to get past the election. If he was being threatened, he'd have done way more damage by saying something last week rather than going quietly now. If this is payback, it's pretty weak. In any case, he can still be called to testify - it's a congressional investigation, for goodness' sake, and he's a retired general. Just quitting doesn't get him off the hook.
I think we already have a pretty good idea what the CIA is going to say, and it's probably not going to be the sort of thing lindsay graham dreams about. It's just as likely that petraeus was worried that the reps would leak the story when he didn't dance to their tune. More likely, he just figured that once he was on the front pages, rumors would taken seriously. This way he breaks the story himself, rather than seeing it on Fox. It isn't the democrats who're looking for scalps.
Obama is back in office. He has the numbers to avoid impeachment. Why on earth would he be threatening people NOW?!? It's a stupid theory that doesn't make any sense.
There are freaks over at PJM who're even seriously suggesting that the affair was a 'honey trap'.
|
|
|
Post by jack on Nov 10, 2012 22:46:40 GMT 10
Obama still has questions to answer. We don't know yet what they will be, but you know how it works. There are freaks over at PJM who're even seriously suggesting that the affair was a 'honey trap'. Mmm-hmmm!
|
|
|
Post by chookmustard on Nov 15, 2012 14:18:00 GMT 10
Questions to answer....sounds like Julia and all those 'questions' she needs to answer. Seriously, nobody I know would have clue or an interest in AWU 'scandal'. It is all sooooo confected by trollumnists and trollpinionators.
Suspect same in US and UK
|
|
|
Post by angra on Nov 21, 2012 12:20:05 GMT 10
What's an 'invisible user'? I see one has been active recently.
Spooky!
|
|
|
Post by jules on Dec 5, 2012 11:53:17 GMT 10
Angra - as I've been away do you still have issues finding posts? I haven't been deleting them so unless its a proboards error then I dunno whats going on but I'll try and sus it out.
An invisible user is someone who is a member but has chosen to remain hidden when they log on to the site. if you go to your profile you can modify your profile to remain invisible to everyone but stafgf members by activating the option to be invisible.
|
|
|
Post by angra on Dec 5, 2012 13:05:28 GMT 10
Jules - nope. It was just silly me being unfamiliar with the navigation methods.
Also, why would someone want to be invisible? I suppose that's just a feature of the site.
|
|
|
Post by angra on Dec 5, 2012 14:39:35 GMT 10
re. The Petraeus resignation, and strange tweets by Rupe. Petraeus was Rupe's stooge to stand for Presidency, but crashed and burned after the affair gossip by the very same gutter rags that Murdoch built his house upon! Hoist by his own petard. "Never shy of an excuse to oust Barack Obama, Rupert Murdoch's fair and unbiased news network dangled the biggest prize of all in front of America's ranking military man. Petraeus should resign from the military and run for president, Roger Ailes suggested. Petraeus said he "would love to see" Ailes on his next trip to New York, where Ailes has his office. "Tell him if I ever ran (for Presidency)," Petraeus said, and then laughed, "but I won't ... but if I ever ran, I'd take him up on his offer. ... He said he would quit Fox ... and bankroll it." "Bankroll it?" asked McFarland, who served as a senior aide to Henry Kissinger and later as a Pentagon spokeswoman in the Reagan administration. "Or maybe I'm confusing that with Rupert," Petraeus said. "I know Roger, he's done OK," McFarland replied, "but ... no, I think the one who's bankrolling it is the big boss." "That might be it," Petraeus said. "OK," McFarland said, "the big boss is bankrolling it. Roger's going to run it. And the rest of us are going to be your in-house." "Yeah, right, OK," Petraeus said." www.smh.com.au/world/foxs-man-in-the-white-house-how-team-murdoch-touted-petraeus-for-the-presidency-20121205-2auie.html?skin=text-only
|
|
|
Post by jules on Dec 5, 2012 14:48:13 GMT 10
Yeah I think its just a site feature for those who value pseudonomity
|
|